Wednesday 30 December 2015

The clue is in the carbon...

Ever heard of spheroidal carbonaceous particles (SCPs for short)? Well, unless you're really into environmental change research or atmospheric pollutants (which I hope you might be if you've stumbled across my blog), I doubt you have - and if I'm honest, neither had I until I started researching potential stratigraphic markers for the Anthropocene. SCPs are a very distinctive type of black carbon ash particle, which form only as a by-product from the incomplete high temperature (>1000°C) combustion of fossil fuels (Rose 2015; Swindles et al 2015). In other words, these are real physical carbon by-products of human activity from the burning of coal and oil. As a unique and purely anthropogenic particle, detected and preserved with high resolution in marine sediments, lake sediments, peat, and ice cores (Rose 2015), it seems SCPs could be the "golden spike" geologists and stratigraphers need to pinpoint the start of the Anthropocene!

A scanning electron microscopy (SEM)
image of an SCP. Their morphology,
shape, and colour are completely distinctive
(Source: Rose 2015
The presence of SCPs have been discovered synchronously on a global scale (even in remote locations such as Greenland and Antarctica), with a rapid increase in the accumulation of particles starting around the year 1950, coincidently the same time of the Great Acceleration (Rose 2015; Swindles et al 2015Steffen et al 2007; Steffen et al 2011; Steffen et al 2015). The Great Acceleration, aka the "Atomic Age" is characterised by a signal of dramatically increasing and widespread global human impacts on the planet, e.g. increased fossil fuel combustion, rapid atmospheric CO2 increase, use of nuclear bombs, exponential growth in human population, alteration of nitrogen cycles etc (see any of the Steffen et al 2007, 2011, or 2015 papers for more detail). The stratigraphic marker chosen must characterise the nature of the Anthropocene in a range of global archives, and reflect the global pressing impact of humanity on the planet (Swindles et al 2015). Therefore it would seem SCPs, as completely non-natural markers and unambiguous signals of industrial human pollution, could be entirely suitable for an Anthropocene golden spike in the Great Acceleration (Rose 2015).

A recent study by Neil Rose (2015) represents a culmination of over two decades of research undertaken at UCL's Environmental Change Research Centre (ECRC). Rose (2015) looks at sediment cores from 71 lakes across the globe, comparing the timing and accumulation of fly ash SCPs from atmospheric deposition. Though observed start dates for the appearance of SCPs in records varies around the mid-19th century, a considerable increase is detectable in all the lakes around 1950 (Rose 2015). The increased deposition of SCPs represents the sharp rise in energy demand from post-WWII introductions of cheap fossil fuels (Rose 2015). Though deposition has generally declined in recent decades for various reasons such as cleaner fuel technologies, less heavy industry, and cleaner air legislation, the mid-20th century peak is a robust and clear signal of human impact.

Figure from Rose (2015), showing the SCP sediment profile from different lakes across the world. Solid black lines are the mean data, and the red bar is the mid-20th century mark (~1950). The rapid increase in SCPs after 1950 are clearly globally synchronous.
Why SCPs over other markers?

Other indicators of a mid-20th century Anthropocene start, such as trace metals, are prone to degradation and alteration to concentrations from changes in weathering over time (Rose 2015). A popular suggestion is the use of radionuclide fallout from nuclear weapons testing (Zalasiewicz et al 2015), however as Rose (2015) points out, half-lives of these radionuclides prevent them from being a long-term stratigraphic signal. SCPs, on the other hand, have no half-life and thus are expected to preserve well in the long-term (Rose 2015). Furthermore, SCPs are a robust signal at the same time of the Great Acceleration and are temporally close to the Alamagordo nuclear testing of 1945, unlike some proposed radionuclide fallout peaks of the early 1960s (Lewis and Maslin 2015), which occur nearly 20 years after the nuclear testing and a decade after the SCP record peak. As argued by Swindles et al (2015), radionuclides and anthropogenic soil horizons (Certini and Scalenghe 2011) fall out of favour as markers because signals can be diachronous and globally inconsistent.

Thoughts...

Though Rose's study is a fantastic piece of research into a potential marker, and illuminates the permanence of human impact in sediment records, more evidence is required from other natural archives (ice cores, peat, and marine sediments) to confirm the globally synchronous signal. It is essential that the AWG come to an agreement on a suitable GSSP or GSSA for the Anthropocene epoch's lower boundary. SCPs, with their globally synchronous, robust and crystal-clear anthropogenic signal, could be just what the group has been searching for to define the onset of the Anthropocene.

8 comments:

  1. Wow... I did not expect to hear about another marker for the anthropocene! This could really help swing opinions as another global and non-degrading marker. Interesting!

    ReplyDelete
  2. Very interesting-but how can we know whether these SCPs will actually endure within strata,you say they are 'expected to preserve well' .Is it possible that similar particles have existed in the past but left no evidence of their being present? Really strong evidence though,aren't they !

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. This is a great question to ask. Rose (2015) states how anthropogenic-source SCPs show no signs of deterioration in the records, but admits it has only been 170 years! This is clearly a short blip of time on the geologic time scale!

      Hmm, yes and no to your similar particle question...! 'Precursor-SCPs' are carbon-rich particles formed by the meteorite impact with Earth's organic-rich geology at the K-P mass extinction event (Rose 2015). These are thought to have been created in low-temperature expansion of volatiles, and thus are a pre-combustion type of SCP which look quite similar in morphology to industrial fly ash SCPs (but are obviously not formed in the same way). Rose (2015) argues if the SCPs we have seen over the last 2 centuries preserve in the same way as 'precursor-SCPs' from 65 million years ago, they will be good long-term stratigraphic markers. And as it stands, he has no reason to believe they would not preserve the same!

      And yes, I agree :), they are great indicators of human impacts on the planet. Their sources (fossil fuel combustion etc) are one of the most significant features of the Anthropocene concept, so it suits well.

      Delete
    2. Thanks Katy. I would like to learn more about those precursor-SCPs.

      Delete
  3. I think the idea of using a single marker to delineate the start of the Anthropocene is a bit of a flawed concept really. Anything that involves humans is intrinsically multi-facted and incredibly complicated, and climate change is no exception.

    Humans have had such a broad range of impacts on the climate, from GHGs, ocean acidification, ecosystem degradation, land-use change and so on. How can all of these impacts ever be explained by a single variable?

    The challenge of marking the start of the Anthropocene then is entirely unique. Never before has humanity had to deal with a geological epoch of its own creation, and, from the perspective of a human geographer at least, never before has there been such a complicated environemntal problem with so many factors and intricacies as climate change. Maybe such a unique problem requires a unique approach in its deliniation?

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Interesting points made, Joe. I agree with a lot of what you've said - the Anthropocene is a completely unique period of history where humans are the focus of this epoch, but also the decision makers. The problem at hand is extremely complex and nonlinear, hence why there has been so much debate about the concept.

      The variable chosen as a GSSP or GSSA is not used, however, to "explain" the Anthropocene - its purpose is to act as a marker in the geological record, able to pinpoint the start of all these changes. This stratigraphic signal does not have to characterise the Anthropocene as a whole, but it sure should represent some features of it, and the SCPs would. All the other global signals, like you say: GHGs, coral bleaching, land-use change etc, will clearly be detectable too in other ways after this point, but they do not act as the golden spike. This is for various reasons e.g. they are undetectable in the stratigraphy, not a synchronous global signal, or have regional differences in timing.

      Having said that, I argued in an earlier post that perhaps the Anthropocene is a time to change the old traditions of needing a single marker in the record. But if we change these long running geological standards, how can we ever be consistent with future decisions?

      Delete
  4. I agree with Joe, when defining the anthropocene we should use multiple markers. But then that raises the issue of defining when it starts. All the indicators for the start of humans influencing the climate start at different times, so perhaps this is the inherent problem with defining the start of the anthropocene: you need different indicators but they begin at different times.

    Perhaps defining the start of the anthropocene is a meaningless task? And accepting it's presence is what matters.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. You have summarised one of the key issues in the Anthropocene very well, Ollie! There are multiple markers and signals which could (and perhaps, should) be used, but the differences of their timing is a problem.

      Although accepting it's presence is important, for it to be an official epoch on the geologic time scale the start date and associated stratigraphic signal are crucial features which must be defined to abide by standards.

      Delete