I stumbled across a hilarious-yet-truthful satirical post by Simon Inges and Liz Else in the New Scientist (2015), challenging readers to come up with gift ideas for the new geological epoch. The article lists some hard-hitting ideas, for example, perhaps you might buy Mum a year subscription to the 'Clean Water Company', or Dad some 'antique tinned fish' (Inges and Else 2015)? Or how about some brand new 'anti-surveillance make-up' for those awkward teenage years (Inges and Else 2015)?
And we mustn't forget the kids, none of this 'Frozen' merchandise or Lego, they'd much rather prefer a 'de-extinction kit' for all those once-loved endangered and soon-to-be-extinct species!
The kids can't believe Santa brought them a de-extinction kit for Tigers and Elephants! (Source) |
If you can't wait to see the smile of glee on Mum's face when she gets her subscription to the 'Clean Water Company', why not plan ahead a fun game to play with all the family this year? The game is called 'How to Win at the Future', created by Matheson Marcault. The CultureLab section of the New Scientist provides a great step-by-step guide of how to play this game, and, as the article says, 'Tweet like its 2099'! I won't go into the details of the game, so read the short article if you genuinely want to play, I know I will be taking this one home for Christmas! The aim of the game is to provide the funniest/most inappropriate/creative tweet in response to each scenario. The gist reminds me of 'Cards Against Humanity', but instead you use chocolate coins to represent 'likes', and the players must try to use a 'secret word' (e.g. #GameOn, or #YOLO) in their tweet which they write in response to a series of scenarios. You get more likes for the more secret words you can slip into your tweet-responses. After running through the list of scenarios (the article provides 10, but I'm sure you could make up your own), the player with the most likes wins!
One of the scenarios is quoted below:
"It’s 2155, Snow Cloud Epsilon has crashed into a space mirror, raising the prospect of the first Christmas without snow for 43 years. Is it beginning to look a lot less like Christmas?"
"It’s 2019. Now that he’s finally over 35, Justin Timberlake reveals his life’s ambition – to become US president. He plans to run on a global warming platform, but he has not yet chosen a running mate. Any ideas?"And...
"It’s 2039, there’s a buzz over a new app that logs your dreams and matches you with people dreaming similar things. But you don’t even own a smarthat."Well, here's to hoping for a smarthat for Christmas next year! Now, in all seriousness, this game could be a lot of fun if you're a bit of a sarcastic nerd like me, but there are some scary messages entwined in these ideas. Whether it be in future Christmas gifts, or in Christmas family-fun games, the state of our future is largely up to us. We can make the Anthropocene a good or a bad thing, depending on our actions in the next few decades. I only hope these joking scenarios (especially the one about space mirrors) never become reality, and that we can recognise change must happen in our behaviour and politics to prevent a frankly terrifying future epoch. As the saying goes, new year, new me, and new geological epoch with enormous societal, economic, cultural, and scientific consequences. (Yeah okay, I made that last bit up...).
Merry Christmas folks!
I loved this! Although the slightly depressing part is that some aspects are becoming reality... You can now buy Canadian fresh air in Beijing because the city is so polluted! Just imagine getting a bottle of Himalayan air for Christmas because our city air is too polluted... Merry Christmas Katy!
ReplyDeleteThanks, Louis! I had a lot of fun writing this one! It's sadly very true :(. What a scary thought to think we might one day be giving our children or grandchildren a fresh bottle of air!! Merry Christmas!
DeleteWonderfully witty blog post Katy-like all good wit,there are large veins of truth running through it all. I love the 'Snow cloud Epsilon' !!! What a fabulous idea! Joking aside of course,reality is almost always stranger than fiction-and who really knows what we will see in 100 years. Merry Christmas to you and your family!
ReplyDeleteHi Anon, thanks for the comment! Haha I liked that bit too, pokes fun at geoengineering but as you say, there are aspects of truth throughout it. I guess we can only hypothesise! 100 years ago people probably wouldn't have predicted what we have today. Merry Christmas to you and yours too!
DeleteWell this certainly brought me back to reality during this festive time! When do you think the situation will become so bad that this becomes a reality?
ReplyDeleteApologies for the somewhat depressing note of this post, Charlie! I hope you're still having a fantastic festive period.
DeleteIts hard to say...it really depends on how quickly we act to mitigate human detrimental impacts on Earth Systems. If we act quickly, it may be that we never have to see this situation and that our grandchildren and great-grandchildren won't either. However, if we don't act quick enough, or don't act at all, who knows?! This could become a reality in the next few decades or centuries, maybe millennia if we're lucky!
This post reminds me a lot of when the date of Back to the Future happened this year, and comparing their predications with what actually happened!
ReplyDeleteIt's scary to think how extreme our influence on the planet might get, perhaps we will be unwrapping extinct-tigers, then again we might be bringing dinosaurs back to life from DNA. Predictions about the future usually go down as hilarious mistakes, I found this list of some classics: http://www.forbes.com/sites/robertszczerba/2015/01/05/15-worst-tech-predictions-of-all-time/
I thought the same thing when writing it! It really could go one of two ways, we'll be looking back in awe at wild animals and "natural" environments, or we will be cloning and recreating extinct species. Who knows what the future will hold?
DeleteWhat a great article, thanks for sharing Ollie! Made me laugh how wrong we have been in the past. Perhaps I am seriously wrong about the future now, and maybe humans will be able to turn around the Anthropocene into a positive human-influence on the planet?